
Judge Susan Crawford enters race for Wisconsin Supreme Court with majority at stake
In a major victory for democracy and judicial independence, Judge Susan Crawford has won the highly contested Wisconsin Supreme Court race, defeating her Republican opponent, former Attorney General Brad Schimel. Crawford’s victory solidifies the court’s 4-3 liberal majority, a crucial factor in upcoming rulings on abortion rights, labor laws, and electoral regulations.
A Battle Fueled by Unprecedented Spending
This election was one of the most expensive judicial races in U.S. history, with total spending exceeding $90 million. However, the campaign took an even more dramatic turn when billionaire Elon Musk injected over $21 million into efforts to support Schimel’s candidacy. Musk’s influence went beyond financial contributions, raising concerns about the role of big money in judicial elections and whether billionaires should have such a direct impact on democracy.
Adding to the controversy, Musk made headlines by offering $1 million checks to two Wisconsin voters at a campaign rally in Green Bay. This unprecedented move sparked immediate legal challenges from Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, who filed lawsuits to block these payments, citing potential election law violations. Many viewed this as an attempt to manipulate voter sentiment and undermine fair elections.
The People Reject Outside Influence
Despite the Republican Party’s efforts to tilt the race in their favor, Wisconsin voters rejected these tactics and chose to uphold judicial integrity by electing Susan Crawford. The victory is seen as a firm stand against external interference, including Musk’s involvement in state politics. It also sends a strong message that Wisconsinites are unwilling to let billionaires buy influence in their elections.
What This Means for Wisconsin and the Nation
The outcome of this election will have significant consequences for the state and beyond. With major cases pending—including challenges to abortion restrictions, labor protections, and election laws—Crawford’s victory ensures that the court will remain a critical check on conservative policies that could impact millions of residents.
Furthermore, this race serves as a national example of the importance of grassroots activism and voter engagement in the face of massive financial influence. The Republican Party, despite its deep pockets and high-profile endorsements, failed to sway Wisconsin voters who were determined to uphold democratic principles.
Conclusion: A Victory for Democracy, A Warning for Billionaire Influence
Susan Crawford’s victory represents more than just a political win—it is a triumph for judicial independence, democratic values, and the will of the people. However, the election also serves as a warning about the increasing influence of billionaires like Elon Musk in American politics. If left unchecked, this trend could set a dangerous precedent where the highest bidder dictates the future of the nation’s judicial and legislative systems.
As the dust settles, one thing is clear: Wisconsinites have spoken. They have chosen fairness over favoritism, democracy over dictatorship, and justice over judicial manipulation. This victory is not just Crawford’s; it belongs to every American who believes in the power of the people to shape their own future.
Elon Musk’s Involvement in Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Sparks Controversy

Transcript: Elon Musk transforms Wisconsin court race
TodayLatest news & breaking headlinesWhy Elon Musk gave two Wisconsin voters $1m eachYesterdayReutersWisconsin votes in high-profile judicial race after millions spent by MuskToday
Sources